Edwin Rutsch just sent me this link to a video he took of Michael Lerner at a recent event. If you want the one minute version of what the Network of Spiritual Progressives (NSP) is about — the elevator pitch — go to minute 3:15 below, and go to around 5:50 for Michael’s take on moving social energy towards hope and love. Later in the piece he outlines the ESRA (Environmental and Social Responsibility Amendment to the constitution) and the Global Marshall Plan, the two key proposals of the NSP that are a focus of our DC conference this weekend.

Leadership Conference at Ella Baker Center – Michael Lerner – 3of5 from Edwin Rutsch on Vimeo.

Michael’s work — and this video is a good example — constantly challenges me to think about the differences between personal spiritual transformation and collective activism for creating a caring world. They are related but distinct, and exactly how they relate is not easy to understand.

When you ask “spiritual” or religious people how the world will change, the most common answer is some version of “one person at a time.” Whether the person is into such distinct spiritual practices as meditation, being born again, repentance, or learning new social skills of empathy and connection, the experience that is most real to them is typically a personal one. While a few people pick up such an experience from a book, it’s most often found through a community, congregation, class or personal encounter: you learn it face to face. The idea shared across many religious movements is that if the world is to be run more by love and caring, then we each need some kind of personal experience of change that enables us to be more unselfish and compassionate. And without such one-by-one transformations, nothing will happen to change the world.

But there’s another whole level of spiritual experience that many people have had — perhaps all of us have had — that we don’t speak about much or even identify as having happened. It’s a collective experience rather than a personal one. It’s how you feel in the crowd at a game when your team might possibly win, or in church when singing with everyone lifts you out of yourself, or a dance or concert when the music blows you away, or when, oppressed by some public disaster, hope suddenly appears: the trapped miners are contacted and are still alive, the Gulf oil well might be capped this time, the ceasefire might actually hold.

Waves of compassion, hope and possibility can lift up vast numbers of people. This is what I understand Michael to be talking about in this video, and what he writes about in Tikkun, and has dedicated his life to promoting. In the video he says if the audience doesn’t like his ideas about how to do it they should come up with their own, but he begs them to do so on the most utopian level, so that they allow their hearts and minds to be drawn to what they deeply desire, not to what seems feasible.

This idea of social energy moving towards hope isn’t just a crowd experience, something to be disparaged and warned against. This energy can lead you to donate money you didn’t think you could afford to help Haitian earthquake victims, or to vote for someone who is promising to speak with our enemies at any time and not just fight them harder. It can lead you to join a civil rights or peace movement: not so much in the dark days when the movement seems to be marginalized and it’s not hope so much as faith and principle and comradeship that keeps the organizers going, but certainly once the social energy has started to flow the movement’s way.

Movements are like that. They often start with a determined few who are in the wilderness, imagining the impossible, like the small band of Quakers who in the 18th century dreamed that slavery might be abolished, or the people today who imagine the rich countries deciding to end world poverty in our lifetimes. Watch the Harvey Milk movie, when Harvey asks his own dedicated campaign staff to come out to their own families, telling them that that is how the country will change: that is a moment in the GLBT movement’s history when it is still marginalized, and the dream of an LGBT-friendly world seems impossibly distant, but some people hold the vision, and they build the social energy just in their small group. That is a time when it is one by one, as each individual comes out, but the vision is that the momentum will build. As it does, hope spreads among more LGBT people that they can come out too, and understanding spreads in the straight population. The latter are responding to individuals who have come out, and at the same time to a reduction of “fear of the other” in society at large: social energy shifts on the widest scale, as something more than one-by-one happens.

When a movement takes off, it can be as sudden as the rise of the antislavery movement in England in the late 1700s (which was dramatic as it has been called the first time a popular political movement arose that was focused on the needs of others). People argue that there was a relationship between that suddenness and the Methodist religious revival that had been going on in England for some time before, but it’s hard to make a cast iron case for that. Not everyone who came out for abolition had gone through some important personal spiritual experience — other than the very important one of being moved by the moral argument and the hope of a campaign succeeding. Joining the social energy towards a hopeful and caring solution to some major problem doesn’t depend on your having done multiple spiritual exercises. Though individualized transformative experiences can predispose people to embrace a positive social approach, they sometimes also predispose people to disparage the bearers of hope — a politician, perhaps, a business person, a celebrity, or a minister — if they don’t belong to their own spiritual tradition and haven’t had the “right” experiences. Spiritual snobbery is alive and well. Sometimes it’s the “sinners” who join the hopeful social energy — we can all be moved.

We need to become much better educated and aware of how social energy is built towards fear and hate on the one hand, and towards love and hope on the other. And much more aware of how to overcome our embarrassment about being seen as utopian dreamers in order to promote ideas that could actually come to pass if more people signed on to them and moved the social energy towards them.